Where Brazil Meets the USA: The Largest Community

 If the state wants to be the one making all the moves and causing the changes, it needs to deal with those market vibes, you know? To make significant changes, the state will most likely need to address both the supply and demand sides. In this lit perspective, you can't just expect the state to make development moves without any setbacks or obstacles, you know? As previously stated, obstacles and hindrances can be found on the path to development, and discovering and overcoming them is part of the development process, you know? According to Hirschman, the state may face significant challenges when making development decisions. 

This could be due to a completely anti-progressive mindset or people with their own selfish interests that are impacted by these decisions.

OMG, having too many distributive concerns can lead people to believe that progress should be distributed equally throughout society (Hirschman 1958, p. 11). That mindset is going to completely block development decisions that require a "pick the winner policy." For real, infant industry policies that completely protect some industrial sectors and provide them with special credit and tax breaks can be completely canceled if there is too much distributive awareness, ya know? process." (Op. cit., p. 140). It may also improve the vibes of the squad and cause firms to flex on each other, providing additional motivation to perform (op. cit., p.140). Their argument was not about whether a vibrant economy with all of the vibes is preferable to going it alone, or whether developing countries should not capitalize on their natural talents and advantages. The vibe of their theories was that some sectors are way more lit than others, ya know? For example, in industrial economies, these dynamic sectors are constantly gaining traction, and developed countries are fully capitalizing on these dynamics. 

The vibes of demand here are the urges it elicits in managers and personnel to make moves to level up the organization and slay the competition. 

A second way to get things moving for development is to invest in sectors that require big moves, constant and light maintenance, and must meet high quality standards, all of which require permanent and skilled decision making from both private and public players. In other words, these activities must be exciting in order for decision makers to be motivated to deliver. Okay, so, decision-making is definitely a learning experience. The more decisions you make, the better you will be at making future decisions. It's all about the growth, you know. The more they say "stay woke" and "stay educated," the more the decision makers will learn, you know? The vibes that influence the development process pass through the web of decision-making it flexes. That is, the more complex the decision making related to a primary decision center, the more effects it is likely to have on development when activated, ya know? According to OMG and Raúl Prebisch's centre-periphery theory (1959), increasing returns and linkage effects from industry were more important for development than natural endowments in countries. Lit! OMG, Myrdal is all about that open-contact vibe, you know? In a laissez faire context, it appears that connecting industrial and agricultural countries would significantly increase the productivity gap between them.  If economic development is a total vibe that can be flexed to legitimize the state domestically and on the international stage, then the state will most likely play that role, you know? The state's ability to exercise authority through laws and enforcement, to tax and manage money, and to look out for the nation's interests and the needs of its people may help boost development vibes.

For example, using factor endowments more effectively will not result in the desired lit dynamic effects.

In these situations, if developed and underdeveloped countries have too much contact, it will completely disrupt the underdeveloped countries' development because they have no say in the super cool productive stuff. For real, List and the center-periphery scholars were all about the idea that economic development required a major structural transformation from within underdeveloped areas. It was crucial, you know? Countries that would totally flex and help the global economy level up and vibe together. So, the real question is all about the vibe of the agent who can completely break the mold of the lame downward circular causation forces in underdeveloped countries and make things way more lit with the upward circular causation forces of development. Catastrophes, wars, invasions, and disruptions to international commerce have all played a role in bringing about change, you know? Often, these events cause people to abandon their own interests in favor of larger goals. But, can the state intentionally and consistently make things happen and mobilize factors to help the economy?